Even as a child, I had this strange fascination with monsters, strange creatures and mythical beings. There used to be a 'Monsters' section on the old Collier's Encyclopedia which I read over and over again. There's now a term for the study of these creatures, and it's called 'cryptozoology'. It's the zoology of weird things on our planet, and we have a feature right here on this blog.
According to Wikipedia:
In the study of cryptozoology, a cryptid is any animal or creature that has been reported to have existed, but has not been proven to. The literal meaning of the word is "the study of hidden animals". Their presumed existence is often derived from anecdotal evidence and/or other evidence insufficient to prove their existence with scientific certainty.
Cryptids are also uncommonly known by the term Unidentified Mysterious Animals or UMA, an intended variation on the popular term UFO. The English use of the term was coined by John E. Wall in 1983 and has been used ever since to describe the creatures which are the focus of cryptozoology.
The term 'cryptid' may include creatures such as the Yeti, Thunderbird or Loch Ness Monster, or relict animals (once presumed extinct) such as the coelacanth (to the right, from a picture on National Geographic). The term is also used to describe now confirmed animals such as the okapi (the deer-like mammal pictured below), once thought to be a fictional animal until it was discovered in the early 1900s.
Cryptids have existed for many ages, although earlier cryptids such as the griffin or dragon, are by and large considered mythical creatures which have never existed other than in popular fiction. Early cryptids include creatures such as the Kraken, which have now entered into legend as fictitious entities or have since been debunked and attributed to exaggerated sightings of creatures unknown in earlier times. Other cryptids include those which were known to man, but have since been pronounced extinct, as was the case with the moa and thylacine which are both reported to be living today. Despite the large number of reported cryptids, most are never proven and a large portion are debunked through thorough scientific investigation.
Of course, there are a whole lot of cryptids now, when I thought there were only several. Apparently, the list has grown to include a wide variety of creatures, whether from local folklore (like the Chupacabra of South America or the Leeds Devil of New Jersey), urban legend, or even old creatures from the past (like The Congo's Mokele-Mbembe, or The Beast of Busco in Indiana). Check out the entire list- at least one compiled so far- by Wikipedia.
From the Philippines, we have the aswang, manananggal and the tikbalang. I think there should be a kapre on that list as well, though they may have classified that one under 'sasquatch', 'giant' or 'malevolent tree spirit' under the 'Legendary Creatures' category.
In any case, it's always an interesting read, and something I'd like to get back to every so often. Hopefully we find a good story worth sharing to other people online, which is really what The Cryptid Files is all about.
Cheers, everyone.
1 comment:
I may not any udiscovered before but when I was a little boy I was through the woods I got to the edge of the trees and saw a large patch of short or dead grass, I didn't notice the strangeness at the time because people hardly came out there let-alone with a lawn-mower.In the patch of short grass near the midle there were 3flowers if you could call them flowers they had a little round thing on top with qaurter inch long spikes alloverit.And the strangest thing about it was changing from pink to purple and vice-versa it looked like there were two nonmixable colored liqouids stuck to the insides a hollow shell.But I'm prety sure it wasn't hollow.And when I tried to touch it I got shocked.I was to young to relize the potential of the plant,So I headed home.I tried to tell my parent about it but of corse they didn't believe me.
Post a Comment